1 Feb
2006
1 Feb
'06
4:53 p.m.
Hi Nate,
On 2/1/06, Nate DeSimone <desimn(a)rpi.edu> wrote:
I personally think that worded that way, the amendment
is redundant
since it simply restates that you must to clean room reverse
engineering. All it amounts to is a clarification that the clean room
approach must also be taken for undocumented APIs, so in effect what is
the point of adding this in the first place? The only reason to add
this is to prevent misinterpretation of "clean room reverse engineer."
I would like to agree on language and put it to the standard 7 day
vote. The emergency IRC meeting left some developers out due to time
constraints. I think we all agree on the clean room, one reverses the
other implements policy but I want to be sure we have the correct
language in place.
--
Steven Edwards - ReactOS and Wine developer
"There is one thing stronger than all the armies in the world, and
that is an idea whose time has come." - Victor Hugo