Re: [ros-dev] GetGlyphOutline

[Andrew Scott]

Sorry, I was trying to pointing out the comment sedwards made.

Maarten Bosma wrote:
> That bug is a unimplemented call. It is doubtable that it will be 
> implemented while the audit, isn't it ?
>
> Maarten Bosma
>
> Andrew Scott wrote:
> > On a bug i had open i got this:
> >
> > [e-mail] changed:
> >       What    |Removed                     |Added
> >         Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
> >     Resolution|                            |WONTFIX
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ------- Additional Comments From [e-mail]  2006-01-31 
> > 08:43 CET -------
> > Reopen if problem is still there after the audit
> >
> > Maarten Bosma wrote:
> > > Why do you want to close all bugs ? Most of them will be still vaild 
> > > after the audit. I'd say the better solution is to add them to the 
> > > patch  category.
> > >
> > > Maarten Bosma
> > >
> > > Steven Edwards wrote:
> > > > Hi James,
> > > >
> > > > On 1/31/06, James Tabor
> > > > [e-mail] wrote:
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > > I finished a fast port of GetGlyphOutline from Wine. Not too bad, 
> > > > > no crashes.
> > > >
> > > > Nice. Can you open a bug on bugzilla and attach a patch there? I am
> > > > closing out all of the bugs except for the ones that have patches with
> > > > them so we can merge them as part of the audit.
> > >
> > > Ros-dev mailing list
> > > [e-mail]
> > > http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
> >
> > Ros-dev mailing list
> > [e-mail]
> > http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>
> Ros-dev mailing list
> [e-mail]
> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev