Re: [ros-dev] ROS-release prepared

[Robert Köpferl]

Just now, I was on to extract the changelog off the wiki.
While I came across your message, I thought, that this is exactly the 
right information I need. I can't say whehter you shal include this or 
that. At least it is usus to not provide every very detail, because the 
changelog on sf is rather for end-users to read (if). If you tell me to 
include your information in the wiki, I'll wait till tomorrow to include it.
Seems like it is my part to delete potential unnecessary log entries. Or 
is anyone here who claims this decissions for her/himself ??

Brandon Turner wrote:
>   In an attempt to make this more of a full release then
> something we are 
>  blwoing off I have skimmed through the svn logs and pulled out all 
>  things i think should be in the change log.  Here is a raw output of 
>  what changes i think should should be added:  
>  www.brandonturner.org/ROS/0.2.7.txt   I dont know if i said this in my 
>  last email or not but I dont know what is important what isnt really so 
>  this could be way off.  3 big things that happened which arent stressed 
>  in the raw log, Filip changed everything(?) to USE_W32API, Filip and 
>  Alex mostly did all the ndk and other header fixes to make them windows 
>  compatible, Casper did rbuild.  I dont know if the first two things will 
>  be added in generic or need to be added in all sections that they apply 
>  too(im guessing most?).  Anyways, later today im going to go through the 
>  raw changes again and later tonight im going to add them to the wiki.  
>  Please tell me anything in there that should not be added to change log 
>  or anything i missed.
>  
>  Thanks
>  Brandon
>  
>  Robert Köpferl wrote:
>  
> >  
> >
> >  WaxDragon wrote:
> >
> > >   These issues you have described are known, but
> > > intermittent.  I have
> > >  tested the 0.2.7 branch under vmware, qemu and real hardware, and the
> > >  branch has performed consistantly under each platform.  Considering
> > >  the bugs we *did* catch for 0.2.7, I think it's a good release.  The
> > >  0.2.7 branch has the TC 's blessing. Ship it. 
> >
> >
> >  Your word in echelon's ear.
> >  It'll be upped until tomorrow.
> >  The RC-releases will disappear as will 2.6
> >
> >  Hope this will be one of our better releases. (looking to 2.6)
> >
> >
> > >  
> > >  WD 
> >
> >  _______________________________________________
> >  Ros-dev mailing list
> >  Ros-dev(a)reactos.com
> >  http://reactos.com:8080/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
> >
> >  
>  
>  _______________________________________________
>  Ros-dev mailing list
>  Ros-dev(a)reactos.com
>  http://reactos.com:8080/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>