2 Feb
2006
2 Feb
'06
4:16 p.m.
Rick Langschultz wrote:
I think ReactOS should have no Reverse Engineered code
within it.
Reverse Engineering could be bad for the projects publicity and code-base.
I think that reverse engineering of the Microsoft Code
is wrong!!!
And if programmers within this project want to reverse engineer they
should start their own projects, with their own names, and use their
own code. How would you like your product(s) to be stolen?
It's not wrong, and it's not illegal. If Microsoft provided better
documentation for their internal interfaces, then it wouldn't be required.
Without reversing to discover how various parts work, ReactOS would struggle
to make a fully compatable system.
You don't think that writing an operating system to effectively clone the
Windows methodologies is wrong, yet you think that reversing various parts
to discover how it works is. That doesn't make sense to me.
As long as there is no code copying, there is no problem. One person
reverses and documents how something works, another person reads the docs
and reimplements it. It's just like reading a book.
It's no different than dismantling an engine, or a calculator, or a toy to
understand how it works.
Ged
************************************************************************
The information contained in this message or any of its
attachments is confidential and is intended for the exclusive
use of the addressee. The information may also be legally
privileged. The views expressed may not be company policy,
but the personal views of the originator. If you are not the
addressee, any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other
dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this message in error, please contact
postmaster(a)exideuk.co.uk
<mailto:postmaster@exideuk.co.uk> and then delete this message.
Exide Technologies is an industrial and transportation battery
producer and recycler with operations in 89 countries.
Further information can be found at www.exide.com