On Tue, 11 Jan 2005 13:59:36 -0500 Alex Ionescu ionucu@videotron.ca wrote:
I agree, I was proposing something like this before too, so I'm glad someone else is having the same idea. Instead of an error, maybe it would be less annoying to have the Ex* functions throw out a DPRINT1... Although that would be harder to trace.
I don't like the printing way because we won't see them if they're called only rarely. The problem is code that's rarely executed also is likely to be buggy.