Re: [ros-dev] Undocumented APIs

[Robert Shearman]

Thomas Weidenmueller wrote:
> Casper Hornstrup wrote:
> > Why implement something which is not used? From a survival POV, ReactOS is
> > better off doing what is needed instead of doing what is not needed.
>
> Good luck. From a survival POV, we shouldn't even implement anything not
> documented publicly. Okay, then let's reinvent a native api to the
> kernel. If it turns out an application or driver really depends one one
> we're in deep sh... Not that I cared.

If you think a driver or application will depend on something then you 
can write a test program/driver and include it in the ReactOS tree. That 
would seem to satisfy the requirements. Black box testing is also 
"cleaner" (and usually faster) than clean-room reverse engineering.
-- 
Rob Shearman