Then provide proof that it can't be written another way. Also, no one has
mentioned why ReactOS need this code. Which driver or application won't work
without this code?
Casper
_____
From: ros-dev-bounces(a)reactos.org [mailto:ros-dev-bounces@reactos.org] On
Behalf Of Brian
Sent: 19. januar 2006 18:50
To: ReactOS Development List
Subject: Re: [ros-dev] Bye bye
I have steped in on other matters where a project developer ( was Alex also
) was attacked. Seeing that these "growing pains" of the project seem to be
re-occuring ( and in diferent areas of the project ). I realize I am an
outsider of the project, but none the less, i feel that an important problem
is starting to rear its little ugly head: there aren't any non-developer
types there to help deal with sticking to policy ( because from what i can
see, the developers are to envolved with code to handle policy) and I think
that in order to prevent further contamination of the code, there needs to
be a single (or group) individual responsable for collecting information on
how MS handles things.
In this matter, I have to say that I agree with WD and think Alex's actions
were ok. He showed that if required to re-write his code, he would at least
have enough of an understanding to write something that worked. I feel that
Hartmut's actions are hostile, and questionable, though I do agree that the
binary code doesn't lie, and a major portion of React OS binary is similar
to MS'es, but in duplicating functionality, this should be expected...
brian