The only issue here is that we'd have to duplicate a lot of coding effort from Wine - if we are to use most Wine code then we don't have to bother. We can just use the existing Wine DLLs as they are at this stage.
IMO if it ain't broke, don't fix it. :)
On Sat, 13 Nov 2010 22:16:11 +1100, Timo Kreuzer timo.kreuzer@web.de wrote:
I have thought about the multiple Windows version thing some time ago and had some ideas. One idea is to Reorganize the functionality, similar to the way it's done in Windows 7. some of the win32 dlls would become wrapper dlls and forwarding to the actual implementations. These wrapper dlls would be tiny and we could have different sets of wrapper dlls for different windows versions. They might also forward to different implementations of the same api on different versions if required. This could be done on runtime, with something similar to sxs, only user configurable rather than manifest based.
So instead of importing the vista function RegDeleteTree from kernel32.dll a wine dll would import it from something like API-ROS-Core-Registry.dll
This way we could as well cleanup our dependency tree and layout stuff more window 7 alike
Ros-dev mailing list Ros-dev@reactos.org http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev