Re: [ros-dev] GetGlyphOutline

[Maarten Bosma]

That bug is a unimplemented call. It is doubtable that it will be 
implemented while the audit, isn't it ?


Maarten Bosma

Andrew Scott wrote:
>   On a bug i had open i got this:
>  
>  
>  sedwards(a)reactos.com changed:
>  
>            What    |Removed                     |Added
>  ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
>  
>              Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
>          Resolution|                            |WONTFIX
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  ------- Additional Comments From sedwards(a)reactos.com  2006-01-31 08:43 
>  CET -------
>  Reopen if problem is still there after the audit
>  
>  
>  Maarten Bosma wrote:
>  
> >   Why do you want to close all bugs ? Most of them
> > will be still vaild 
> >  after the audit. I'd say the better solution is to add them to the 
> >  patch  category.
> >
> >
> >  Maarten Bosma
> >
> >
> >  Steven Edwards wrote:
> >
> > >   Hi James,
> > >
> > >  On 1/31/06, James Tabor
> > >  <jimtabor(a)adsl-64-217-116-74.dsl.hstntx.swbell.net> wrote:
> > >
> > > >   Hi,
> > > >  I finished a fast port of GetGlyphOutline from Wine. Not too bad, no 
> > > >  crashes. 
> > >
> > >
> > >  Nice. Can you open a bug on bugzilla and attach a patch there? I am
> > >  closing out all of the bugs except for the ones that have patches with
> > >  them so we can merge them as part of the audit.
> > >  
> >
> >  _______________________________________________
> >  Ros-dev mailing list
> >  Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
> >  http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev 
>  
>  
>  _______________________________________________
>  Ros-dev mailing list
>  Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
>  http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev