Well, it is time for me to chime in....

I agree that we need to have a third party audit the code. It looks better on us, and makes us look more legitimate. And if we can share code with Wine... all the better. No more reinventing the wheel than we have to.

One thing I do have to point out from being a poli-sci major is that every one has their own interests, every one--even groups. FSF, codeweavers,
SFLC, and even ReactOS. And if they converge, great.... we get help. If they don't, well... we are on our own.

Yes, we do need financial packing. It would help things go a lot faster. But right now... I think people are waiting to see how stable and compatible ReactOS will be.

Well, that is my two dimes (what--inflation anyone?)

Steven Edwards wrote: 
On 9/23/07, Alex Ionescu <ionucu@videotron.ca> wrote:
  
You should read behind James's right-wing tone and ramblings (which,
say what you will, is an effective means of getting his point across,
if only by the fact it creates responses such as yours), and drill
down to his actual not-so-insane point: SFLC is evil. FSF is evil.
Wine is their tool.
    

No its not. It further alienates people in the middle. James has
become the ReactOS equivalent of McCormack on this issue. Now its my
turn for ad-hominem, drop the evildooers bullshit as it makes both of
you sound like Bush and deal with facts.