what about some "art" repo?
It might have icons, wallpapers, some image and/or video galleries.....
(just like Demo images and videos at Windows folders....)
On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 7:03 PM, Mark Jansen <mark.jansen(a)reactos.org>
wrote:
How about having a separate repository for
wallpapers,
and in 'master' or whatever only have the 'last release' wallpaper +
one or 2 alternatives?
The wallpaper repo can then have a structure where there is a folder
per release,
and an additional folder for potential candidates for next releases.
On 8 September 2017 at 16:47, Colin Finck <colin(a)reactos.org> wrote:
Am 08.09.2017 um 14:34 schrieb Hermès
BÉLUSCA-MAÏTO:> It seems that both
these links :
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/3946538/git-clone-just- the-files-please
get-just-the-latest-revision
give a clue on how to just download the files without the history... >
> [...]
>
>>
>> The builder(s) can have a "working" directory, in which they check-out
>> the
>> different "projects" they need for the build: reactos source can be
DL'ed
>> into
>> "working/reactos.git" ; the wallpapers, rostests etc... can be
DL'ed
into
>> "working/rostests" and
"working/wallpapers", then symlinks (OK on
*nix &
>> windows) into the
"working/reactos.git/modules" can be created that
point
> to
"working/wallpapers" and "working/rostests" , and then we build as
> usual
> ?
Both of your ideas destroy the automatic relationship of a specific
revision
of "reactos" with a specific revision
of the modules.
We don't want to start telling people to use that particular version of
"reactos" with that particular version of "rostests". It gets even
worse if
you want to hack on both in a branch..
So matching versions must always stay together, and this is why I want
to
keep them in a single repository, only
enabled/disabled by a CMake
variable.
Of course, the logical next step would be overhauling our tree layout.
But first things first ;)
>>> * I don't get the idea of that "rossubsys" directory created in
2014..
>>> These subsystems are all stubs, never
built with modern ReactOS, and
>>> no work has happened since "reviving" them. I would just go and
remove
>>
them again. You can always find them in our repository history.
>>
> As long as they can be found easily in the history, then ok.
As with every Version Control System, the difficulty of finding deleted
files in history boils down to the creativity of your used GUI :)
Shortcut for you to find related commits:
git log --name-only | grep -C 5 rossubsys
I have updated my conversion scripts and rules at
https://github.com/ColinFinck/reactos-git-conversion-scripts to split
off
"documentation" into its own
repository.
Also they now perform the "reactos" directory reorganization and add the
"0.4.7-dev" tag for git describe.
Cheers,
Colin
_______________________________________________
Ros-dev mailing list
Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
_______________________________________________
Ros-dev mailing list
Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
_______________________________________________
Ros-dev mailing list
Ros-dev(a)reactos.org