Re: [ros-dev] Re: [ros-diffs] [ion] 14047: Dispatching & Queue Rewrite II:

[Richard Campbell]

I'm not sure, but i believe he is referring to the 'checked build' 
versions of windows nt...that is, versions of NT that included debugging 
symbols.

Hartmut Birr wrote:

>  Alex Ionescu schrieb:
>
>   
>
> >  Hartmut Birr wrote:
> >
> >     
> >
> > >  Alex Ionescu schrieb:
> > >
> > >       
> > >
> > > >  This introduces hacks into KeWaitXxx (remember !=
> > > > WrQueue?? :P) and
> > > > also, if you look inside a checked build of NT, you will find
> > > > ASSERT(Header->Type != QueueObject) inside KeWaitXxx so that really
> > > > made me unshare the code :)
> > > >
> > > >   
> > > >         
> > > >  
> > > Can you explain this a little bit more?
> > >
> > >       
> > >  
> > In order to share the code, Gunnar had to insert a hack into the wait
> > code not to do some things if the wait mode is WrQueue. By using a
> > dedicated function, the hack can be removed.
> >
> >     
> >  
> Currently I'm not content with this     answer , I expect more an answer
> to 'if you look inside a checked build of NT'.
>
> - Hartmut
> _______________________________________________
> Ros-dev mailing list
> Ros-dev(a)reactos.com
> http://reactos.com:8080/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>
>   
>