I keep reading this on the forums, I don't understand how a newer, revised, edition
with less mistakes than an older one is somehow "worse" to describe a clone of
the OS being described.
On 2009-11-09, at 6:04 PM, Javier Agustìn Fernàndez Arroyo wrote:
i thought only few parts of 5th edition are useful for
ROS, and most of it was based on 4th
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 11:15 PM, Alex Ionescu <ionucu(a)videotron.ca> wrote:
5th.
On 2009-11-09, at 5:03 PM, Javier Agustìn Fernàndez Arroyo wrote:
Windows Internals, 4th Edition
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 4:35 PM, rahul nagpal <rahulnagpal1989(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
Hey, i can get th source code of reactos, but i can't understand the coding, your
programmer who wrote these type of coding can also be refer any book/notes.You please tell
me the name of that book, for which i can also take refrence for understanding the lower
level of coding for making kernel and other files.I know these type of
languages(C,C++,Java Core,VC++,Oracle 8i,html),but not for the hardware level only for
making user level programs.So Please help me do this task easier and i also tell you that
i didn't know the way to access your channel #reactos also help me i have no
sufficient time to take part in it but i try so please refer any book.Thanxxx for making
me the member of your group and Congratulations for your Project Success.... :) (:
_______________________________________________
Ros-dev mailing list
Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
_______________________________________________
Ros-dev mailing list
Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
Best regards,
Alex Ionescu
_______________________________________________
Ros-dev mailing list
Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
_______________________________________________
Ros-dev mailing list
Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev