Re: [ros-dev] 1294 [dreimer] Fix clean for cmake trees. ...

[Olaf Siejka]

Could you PLEASE DELETE PREVIOUS EMAIL CONTENT, TRAILING AT THE END?? AFTER
SEVERAL MESSAGES INCLUDED THAT WAY, TRYING TO SCROLL FOR MINUTES TO REACH TO
THE NEXT MESSAGE IS NOT BLOODY FUNNY!!
I asked for that several times and you guys are still doing this crap! I
have nothing against including important stuff, even if its lenghty, but
stuff like:

>  
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> multilib build
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of Binutils and GCC
> though, would be nice to know how 
much
>  
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> smaller it is
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> compared to separate x86
> and x64 compilers.
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So in general, I agree
> with Timo :-)
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Colin
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> _______________________________________________
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ros-dev mailing list
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> _______________________________________________
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ros-dev mailing list
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> _______________________________________________
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ros-dev mailing list
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> _______________________________________________
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ros-dev mailing list
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> _______________________________________________
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ros-dev mailing list
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> _______________________________________________
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ros-dev mailing list
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> _______________________________________________
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>> Ros-dev mailing list
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>> Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>
> _______________________________________________
>  >>>>>>>>>>>> Ros-dev mailing list
>  >>>>>>>>>>>> Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>
> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>
>  >>>>>>>>>>>
>  >>>>>>>>>>>
> _______________________________________________
>  >>>>>>>>>>> Ros-dev mailing list
>  >>>>>>>>>>> Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
>  >>>>>>>>>>>
> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>  >>>>>>>>>>>
>  >>>>>>>>>>>
>  >>>>>>>>>>
>  >>>>>>>>>> -- 
IS PISSING ME OFF! Could you please think a bit about others?

Regards


2011/6/5 victor martinez <vicmarcal(a)hotmail.com>

>    This thread has been totally going OffTopic :)
>  But as I love this kind of discussion, I will give my opinion.
>  1)Apps, not just MS ones, aren't optimized anymore. I still remember the
>  discussions, when coding, with pointer=pointer+1; and pointer++; or
>  how functions were optimized to be able to run in a limited hardware. And
>  sure, an old Internet Browser was "eating" about 10 MB while one nowadays
>  needs about 200MB. 20 times more. Stats taken from latest IE with just one
>  tab opened, same applies to FF and Chrome.
>  2)Windows 7 is able to run with less than 1GB. I was able to run it in
>  512MB, not as its antecessor Vista.But Vista was just an agreement with
>  Hardware companies to force the movement to 3GB Ram and x64 in laptops,
>  preparing the scene for 7 and 8.
>  3)MS needs a new push. 7 doesnt introduce any new *killer* features for
>  Governments or *Commun* Enterprises. That is the main reason that nowadays
>  XP is still present in 80% of their computers which are being used mainly
>  for Writting/EXCELing purposes. The other 20% is coming from the new
>  *enforced* Pcs/Laptops which directly comes with 7 installed. I just know 1
>  company which decided *freely* to move to 7, but it was a Videogames
>  company. When you *force* a company to move from one product to another
>  one(i.e: stopping Support ) it creates the current *not*lovely*image* MS
>  has. The day MS is able to convince people to buy freely their new OS
>  version, that day its *$* image will begin to change..
>
>  PS: Peace and Love.
>
>