Alex Ionescu wrote:
This is retarded,
That's your opinion.
Why did this require rewriting everything in AT&T
syntax and introducing bugs?
It doesn't. Noone said it does.
And what's up with calling AT&T syntax
"GAS" Syntax.
Yes, what's up with that?
I wonder what Brian would say....
Why don't you ask him and report back to us?
It's funny how this project gets rid of old
developers, gets new
developers, and has them make the same mistakes/idiotic things the old
developers left for in the first place...
Did you leave for AT&T syntax? Too bad.
Anyway, that kinda forces them to find new reasons to leave, doesn't it?
That's innovation!
Regards,
Timo