KJKHyperion wrote:
Additional proposal: invariant ASSERTs in list
manipulation routines,
What does invariant mean?
especially the precondition that inputs are valid
LIST_ENTRYs. Saved my
ass so many times
Yeah. I miss those. I think we had something like that before(?). If
noone objects lets readd list asserts (and no, not the "insane" variant
that walks and validated the entire list, allthou that is very handy
sometimes too;-)
G.