No one said we don't need a plan B. We had a plan B before moving to
github.
In fact, the move to github only happened because people were assured we'd
always have a plan B.
Why? Because github's servers are in the US, and many of the dev team
didn't like the idea to put our sources in US computers.
I will proceed to ignore everything after your first line, because it's
mindless paranoia.
You do have a point about the issues, except we don't host them on github,
so only the Pull Requests would remain, and i'm 100% sure if github becomes
hostile, we'll have plenty time to make a copy of the data.
[I was typing that and the power blinked off long enough to shut down my pc
¬¬]
On 5 June 2018 at 19:43, M. Ziggyesque <ziggyesque(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
No, I don't see it as pointless to have a plan B.
It's more a question of
when, not if, it's desirable, given past practices.
Even with no immediate changes, github can no longer be considered
vendor-neutral. Down the road, as example, M$ may well try to require every
project adopt their code-signing policy or the project gets deleted, so
they get their kickbacks on all the certificate fees that would entail. ROS
doesn't require code-signing?? DELETE!! They did similar when they bought
out sysinternals, bloated all their utilities with certificates, so that's
a distinct possibility.
While migrating the repo itself is easy, the issues list and other history
is less so, plus the hassle of getting links on external pages to redirect
to a new home; those would take some lead time so imo is better to have
some plan than not.
------ Original message------
*From: *David Quintana (gigaherz)
*Date: *Tue, Jun 5, 2018 4:40 AM
*To: *ReactOS Development List;
*Cc: *
*Subject:*Re: [ros-dev] Microsoft acquires GitHub
To elaborate further:
1. The deal won't be closed for many months (they expect december)
2. Microsoft probably won't change github at first (xcept maybe make
the login integrate with a Microsoft Account)
3. We don't know what they plan to do with the platform in the long
term, so worrying now is pointless.
4. We don't know that it will EVER be hostile toward ReactOS, even if
they break the platform and make it unusable, so chances are we are good.
5. If worst comes to worst, as Thomas said, we just say goodbye to GH
and move elsewhere.
On 5 June 2018 at 10:36, Javier Agustìn Fernàndez Arroyo <elhoir(a)gmail.com
wrote:
great! :)
On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 10:34 AM, Thomas Faber <thomas.faber(a)reactos.org>
wrote:
To elaborate, we're not dependent on GitHub
in any significant way. It's
just convenient. But if it stops being so, it's easy to go elsewhere.
That's a key part of Git, being a "distributed" VCS.
On 2018-06-05 10:31, Oleksandr Shaposhnikov wrote:
No it may not.
5 черв. 2018 р. 11:24 Javier Agustìn Fernàndez Arroyo <
elhoir(a)gmail.com>
пише:
-empowering-developers/
<https://nam05.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fblogs.microsoft.com%2Fblog%2F2018%2F06%2F04%2Fmicrosoft-github-empowering-developers%2F&data=02%7C01%7C%7Ca6b7a92ca5c146e5bc5e08d5cac00cc9%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C636637848550395788&sdata=MphM9bR%2F0p14QXZQBKrHGfUK3cmOwVfNKDYXdqtBMVA%3D&reserved=0>
_______________________________________________
Ros-dev mailing list
Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
<https://nam05.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.reactos.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fros-dev&data=02%7C01%7C%7Ca6b7a92ca5c146e5bc5e08d5cac00cc9%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C636637848550552040&sdata=V8%2B3DEP1VRUt2B34MdmNxVef9urlPZ8tYoamkdKQdts%3D&reserved=0>
_______________________________________________
Ros-dev mailing list
Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
<https://nam05.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.reactos.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fros-dev&data=02%7C01%7C%7Ca6b7a92ca5c146e5bc5e08d5cac00cc9%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C636637848550552040&sdata=V8%2B3DEP1VRUt2B34MdmNxVef9urlPZ8tYoamkdKQdts%3D&reserved=0>