16 Jan
2005
16 Jan
'05
10:32 a.m.
Ge van Geldorp wrote:
Must have missed it somewhere... Looking over the patch
again, I see places
where I corrected it but I'm missing again where I introduced it. Can you
point it out to me please?
Just look at the diff of res.c...Looking at the entire file there's
lot's of typecasts to ULONG and arithmetics with pointers that aren't
portable...
Hmm, I thought BOOLEAN was for kernelmode stuff and
BOOL for usermode? Then
again, BOOLEAN might be the native type and BOOL the win32 type. Anyone know
for sure?
AFAIK it should be used in umode and kmode equally, unless defined by
documentation it should be used for variables and function parameters.
However it's not really wrong as we do it in many places, I just thought
i should mention.
Regards,
Thomas