Ah, politics. ;)
Linus Torvalds wouldn't even let a kernel debugger make it into the
kernel for a long time because he seemed to be under the impression
that they are for sissies.
http://linuxmafia.com/faq/Kernel/linus-im-a-bastard-speech.html
http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org/msg01462.html
(note: currently blacked out to try and rais awareness that some
shitheads in the US Congress want to censor the internet [with SOPA and
PIPA legislation] - try after ~12 hours)
(that being said the reply by Ameen Ross may have merit - there are
probably two sides to the story - the LKML should be able to tell)
On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 19:18:48 +0100
Timo Kreuzer <timo.kreuzer(a)web.de> wrote:
Am 18.01.2012 16:06, schrieb Aleksey Bragin:
P.S. Proper answer from Linux team would be "We accept
patches!" :-).
Maybe that doesn't match reality. I remember reading an
article by
some guy who wrote lots of patches for the scheduler and finally
rewrote the whole thing.
It proved to perform better than the original scheduler and many
people were using it, yet it never got incorporated into the mainline
kernel. At some point some other guy rewrote the original scheduler
doing basically the same thing that he had developed earlier and at
that point he quit linux development.
_______________________________________________
Ros-dev mailing list
Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev