+1 for keeping rostests separate
+1 for even more modularity
also i wish we would use/exploit the svn externals feature whenever
possible instead of importing 3rd party code into our repo
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 10:21 AM, Sylvain Petreolle <spetreolle(a)yahoo.fr> wrote:
I fully agree with Timo.
We don't need to have useless files in tree.
Remember we recently deleted stuff from the main tree for the same reasons :
space used and download time.
We do need tests, they are critical, but not in every reactos checkout.
I am for making tests a complete separated project, which would lower build
times even more.
Kind regards,
Sylvain Petreolle
________________________________
De : Timo Kreuzer <timo.kreuzer(a)web.de>
À : ReactOS Development List <ros-dev(a)reactos.org>
Envoyé le : Jeudi 8 mars 2012 1h27
Objet : Re: [ros-dev] [ros-diffs] [jgardou] 56082: [DAMN_IT] - addendum to
r56081
Am I the only one against that?
Tests are tests, not reactos.
Why do I need to have another bazillion files in my source tree that I don't
need or want?
I have ONE checkout of rostests, but a dozen checkouts of reactos. For amd64
work I even disabled build of a lot of stuff that was pointless. Now even
more stuff spread thoughout the whole tree? Possibly even built by default?
Deleting a full reactos checkout is already slow enough. Also every commit
to rostetsts is a possible build breaker and can cause massive rebuilds.
Configure time will also increase.
I would rather prefer to make it even more modular, instead of mixing stuff
even more.
-1
_______________________________________________
Ros-dev mailing list
Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
_______________________________________________
Ros-dev mailing list
Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev