+1 for keeping rostests separate +1 for even more modularity
also i wish we would use/exploit the svn externals feature whenever possible instead of importing 3rd party code into our repo
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 10:21 AM, Sylvain Petreolle spetreolle@yahoo.fr wrote:
I fully agree with Timo. We don't need to have useless files in tree. Remember we recently deleted stuff from the main tree for the same reasons : space used and download time.
We do need tests, they are critical, but not in every reactos checkout. I am for making tests a complete separated project, which would lower build times even more.
Kind regards, Sylvain Petreolle
De : Timo Kreuzer timo.kreuzer@web.de À : ReactOS Development List ros-dev@reactos.org Envoyé le : Jeudi 8 mars 2012 1h27 Objet : Re: [ros-dev] [ros-diffs] [jgardou] 56082: [DAMN_IT] - addendum to r56081
Am I the only one against that? Tests are tests, not reactos. Why do I need to have another bazillion files in my source tree that I don't need or want? I have ONE checkout of rostests, but a dozen checkouts of reactos. For amd64 work I even disabled build of a lot of stuff that was pointless. Now even more stuff spread thoughout the whole tree? Possibly even built by default? Deleting a full reactos checkout is already slow enough. Also every commit to rostetsts is a possible build breaker and can cause massive rebuilds. Configure time will also increase. I would rather prefer to make it even more modular, instead of mixing stuff even more.
-1
Ros-dev mailing list Ros-dev@reactos.org http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
Ros-dev mailing list Ros-dev@reactos.org http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev