Re: [ros-dev] I/O subsystem question

[Phillip Susi]

I believe the socket needs to be opened for async IO then.

Ge van Geldorp wrote:
> > From: art yerkes
> >
> > Hmm.  I know that before moved I created different events 
> > used by each synchronous call in msafd to correct exactly 
> > that problem.  Is that not working?
>
> The problem was that the handle was opened with the
> FILE_SYNCHRONOUS_IO_NONALERT option. This caused NtDeviceIoControlFile to do
> an internal wait if the driver returned STATUS_PENDING. As a result,
> STATUS_PENDING was no longer returned as the status by NtDeviceIoControlFile
> to msafd, so the waits in msafd were bypassed.
> I've attached the proposed patch to bug 713. No comments so far.
>
> Gé van Geldorp.
>
> Ros-dev mailing list
> [e-mail]
> http://reactos.com:8080/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev