17 Feb
2009
17 Feb
'09
1:34 a.m.
I personally feel consistent application of the style
is also important,
and that there does not exist a reason to deviate from the established
coding style in this situation.
I agree that it is good to follow the consistent coding style. The question
is this style itself is good.
I meant the abstract case of ((a = b) && (c = d)), not the concrete case of
((ConvKey == HashEntry->ConvKey) && (Length == Ncb->NameLength)).