I personally feel consistent application of the style is also important, and that there does not exist a reason to deviate from the established coding style in this situation.
I agree that it is good to follow the consistent coding style. The question is this style itself is good.
I meant the abstract case of ((a = b) && (c = d)), not the concrete case of ((ConvKey == HashEntry->ConvKey) && (Length == Ncb->NameLength)).