Re: [ros-dev] Re: [ros-cvs] CVS Update: reactos

[Alex Ionescu]

Eric Kohl wrote:

>  "Aliberti Emanuele" <ea(a)iol.it> wrote:
>
>   
>
> >  Should we define a sort of "best
> > practice" in inserting a little "p"
> > after the subsystem prefix and before the proper function's o
> > structure's name, to mark the *p*rivate symbols, or use the "Internal"
> > suffix?
> >
> > 1) NtpLockVirtualMemory (MmpLockVirtualMemory)
> > 2) NtLockVirtualMemoryInternal
> >     
> >  
> I think the function in question should be called MiLockVirtualMemory
> because it is an internal function of the memory manager. And the Nt- and
> Zw-Prefixes are only used for funtions that are exposed via the Int2e
> interface. Therefore, internal Nt- or Zw-Functions do not exist.
>
> Regards,
> Eric
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ros-dev mailing list
> Ros-dev(a)reactos.com
> http://reactos.com:8080/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>
>   
>  
Hi Eric,

Very good point, I hadn't even noticed this.
Yes, the correct name would be MiLockVirtualMemory.

Best regards,
Alex Ionescu