>> Importing FullFat (even if it requires changes, like converting to kmode)
>> is
>> still WAY faster than developing a new one, based on MS sample code. As
>> we
>> know, FullFat already works, so the testing procedure would be
>> significantly
>> shorter, compared with the one being written from scratch.
>
> FullFAT has already been used by some major embedded projects, Renesas
> have included it
> with their own development environment for all their customers.
>
> Similarly a major development framework for Analog Devices Blackfin
> processors have also adopted
> FullFAT as a standard part of their library.
>
> FullFAT is well tested already, and I intend to write the driver in a
> way that fixes to problems can easily
> be synchronised between the Windows FullFAT driver and the standard
> general purpose driver.
>
>> Finally, FullFat
>> author agreed on colaborating, effectively helping out with the
>> adaptation
>> process. For the new fat driver, we`d still require at least developer,
>> either someone from ReactOS team or outsider.
>> Again, i dont see developers hanging around, waiting to do anything for
>> ReactOS.
>
> In the last year I have gained a substantial interest for Windows
> internals, particularly
> kernel mode stuff, and see working with ReactOS as a great opportunity
> to work with
> some really smart people, and further my own knowledge and ideas.
>
>> So its a choice of ready, funcitoning code and tested, that needs to be
>> adopted, as well as a new developer, eager to help us out. On the other
>> side, there is only a reference MS code, that potentially (even if we`ll
>> be
>> able to actually write a new FAT driver and test it) someone could use as
>> an
>> excuse to question the new driver and spread FUD about its similarity to
>> MS
>> code.
>
> FullFAT will also implement a build-option that removes the FAT patent
> issues.
> This is based on the linux patch, for details see:
>
>
http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/26/313
>
> I think that FullFAT works quite well already, and is 100% my own code
> from scratch.
> When ReactOS use this code, then there can be no uncertainty about its
> legitimacy.
>
>
> Also addressing the questions regarding a journaling system, we can
> simply have the driver
> create a ROS.journal file in the root dir. This file won't mean
> anything to other systems,
> and will simply be ignored. Causing no compatibility issues. If
> another system messes up the
> FAT table or directory structures thats not the fault of ReactOS, and
> would require a full chkdsk.
>
> I think the journal stuff would be something we can add once I have
> FullFAT fully integrated and its working.
>
> Thanks for the input,
>
> James
>
> --
> James Walmsley
> ----------------------------------------
>
james@worm.me.uk
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ros-dev mailing list
>
Ros-dev@reactos.org>
http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
_______________________________________________
Ros-dev mailing list
Ros-dev@reactos.orghttp://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev