hm?

On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 8:33 PM, Samuel serapion <samdwise51@gmail.com> wrote:
Javier this isn't funny. ReactOS is serious business.


2010/4/15 Javier Agustėn Fernāndez Arroyo <elhoir@gmail.com>
well, it will be useful whenever it has to :)
so, i dont see it as a bad commit after all, just funny :P


On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 11:28 AM, Andrew Faulds <ajfweb@googlemail.com> wrote:
Yes, but we get "donations" on all sorts of unnecessary things.
We really need "donations" in useful areas like, say, USB.


On 15 April 2010 10:25, Peter Millerchip <peter.millerchip@gmail.com> wrote:
To be fair:

1. The guy donated his code to ReactOS. Think of it like a gift to us
- it might not be what we really wanted, but it's still rude to insult
a gift.

2. This isn't "support" for PCMCIA, it's a stub - he said so himself.
ReactOS does not support PCMCIA yet.

3. Windows supported PCMCIA before USB, and we are just copying
Windows after all! :)

On 15 April 2010 10:11, Andrew Faulds <ajfweb@googlemail.com> wrote:
> You mean we're supporting an interface no-one needs before the biggest gap
> in ReactOS I/O support?
>
> 2010/4/15 Javier Agustėn Fernāndez Arroyo <elhoir@gmail.com>
>>
>> ReactOS has PCMCIA support before USB
>> lol :)
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 10:46 AM, Aleksey Bragin <aleksey@reactos.org>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I fully agree with Ged. I know it's fun to create something from scratch
>>> (I used and will still do, of course) and work in an explored area, however
>>> I think there should be some control. If you really want to work on that and
>>> nothing else - we have rosapps/drivers. In my opinion, trunk has no place
>>> for non-working drivers which aren't really a top priority (at least, I
>>> didn't include fastfat_new to the build process so noone wastes time
>>> compiling a driver which is needed only by 2 or 3 developers).
>>>
>>> WBR,
>>> Aleksey.
>>>
>>> On Apr 15, 2010, at 11:05 AM, Ged Murphy wrote:
>>>
>>>> I don't mean to sound like a broken record, and I also understand that
>>>> the project allows people to work on whatever they want to. But with the
>>>> project in such a state at the moment, is a pcmcia bus driver really the
>>>> best thing to be working on?
>>>> I'm all for project freedom, but you would hope people to have the
>>>> diligence to work on areas which might help to stop the project from
>>>> failing.
>>>>
>>>> Maybe I just don't get it anymore and I'm behind the times, but what
>>>> happened to the days when people used to work on important things?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Your nagging ex-dev,
>>>> Ged.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: ros-diffs-bounces@reactos.org
>>>> [mailto:ros-diffs-bounces@reactos.org] On Behalf Of cgutman@svn.reactos.org
>>>> Sent: 15 April 2010 02:59
>>>> To: ros-diffs@reactos.org
>>>> Subject: [ros-diffs] [cgutman] 46876: [PCMCIA] - Add a mostly stubbed
>>>> PCMCIA driver - pcmcia.c is complete but fdo.c and pdo.c are completely
>>>> unimplemented
>>>>
>>>> Author: cgutman
>>>> Date: Thu Apr 15 03:59:15 2010
>>>> New Revision: 46876
>>>>
>>>> URL: http://svn.reactos.org/svn/reactos?rev=46876&view=rev
>>>> Log:
>>>> [PCMCIA]
>>>> - Add a mostly stubbed PCMCIA driver
>>>> - pcmcia.c is complete but fdo.c and pdo.c are completely unimplemented
>>>>
>>>> Added:
>>>>    trunk/reactos/drivers/bus/pcmcia/
>>>>    trunk/reactos/drivers/bus/pcmcia/fdo.c   (with props)
>>>>    trunk/reactos/drivers/bus/pcmcia/pcmcia.c   (with props)
>>>>    trunk/reactos/drivers/bus/pcmcia/pcmcia.h   (with props)
>>>>    trunk/reactos/drivers/bus/pcmcia/pcmcia.rbuild   (with props)
>>>>    trunk/reactos/drivers/bus/pcmcia/pcmcia.rc   (with props)
>>>>    trunk/reactos/drivers/bus/pcmcia/pdo.c   (with props)
>>>> Modified:
>>>>    trunk/reactos/drivers/bus/directory.rbuild
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Ros-dev mailing list
>>>> Ros-dev@reactos.org
>>>> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Ros-dev mailing list
>>> Ros-dev@reactos.org
>>> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ros-dev mailing list
>> Ros-dev@reactos.org
>> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>
>
>
> --
> Andrew Faulds (andrewros)
> http://ajf.me/
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ros-dev mailing list
> Ros-dev@reactos.org
> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>

_______________________________________________
Ros-dev mailing list
Ros-dev@reactos.org
http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev



--
Andrew Faulds (andrewros)
http://ajf.me/


_______________________________________________
Ros-dev mailing list
Ros-dev@reactos.org
http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev


_______________________________________________
Ros-dev mailing list
Ros-dev@reactos.org
http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev


_______________________________________________
Ros-dev mailing list
Ros-dev@reactos.org
http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev