-----Original Message----- From: ros-dev-bounces@reactos.org [mailto:ros-dev-bounces@reactos.org] On Behalf Of Lucio Diaz Sent: 17. oktober 2005 00:16 To: ros-dev@reactos.org Subject: [ros-dev] Team work
I am not a developer, but i am an adult man, with some experience with team working and have been reading this mailing list since the begining, and what can i say?
First: I have seen Alex Ionescu apologicing, often, so yes, drop IRONY, Alex is a great listener, and NO! it is not easy to find people who would apologice nowadays.
[CSH] Most of the times when there is a disagreement there is no reason to apologise. We just settle the issue with a vote and follow the outcome in the future (until voted upon again).
Third: I have seen Alex Ionescu as the one in the center of all discusions, and he could be fast to answer, but he proved to be as fast to apologice, and that i have not seen from some other developers.
[CSH] All? Actually can you point me to a posting where Alex apologises? I'm just wondering where you get the "Alex often apologises" from.
Four: It IS NORMAL, to have discussions where you are working in such a big proyect, not everyone can have the same vision of a whole OS, but what have NO sense, is to harass people for doing their work well, just cause there is not a F* paper about their "election".
[CSH] So, you think it's okay for 5 people to grant one person more rights than the other 30 whenever they want (and without telling the other 30 people)?
Fith: I thought this was an open source project, so people commit if they want, if they dont they dont, period. Harassing people wont grow the developer base.
[CSH] I get the feeling that in some cases, what you would call harassment of people, I would call critiquing peoples actions. Maybe you could provide concrete examples? One example where someone is harassed and one where someone critiques someone else's actions. I can provide better arguments in concrete cases than when discussing it in general. Or maybe they are all harassment cases to you?
Casper