Sorry about that. I guess I have read a lot of technical papers ;P

On 25 February 2016 at 12:47, Ged Murphy <gedmurphy.maillists@gmail.com> wrote:
Okay ignore me, we cleared it up in IRC. David means significant, I've just never heard ........ nevermind ......

If moving to git will increase the likelihood of patches from outside the team, then that in itself is a good enough reason to move IMO.


-----Original Message-----
From: Ged Murphy [mailto:gedmurphy.maillists@gmail.com]
Sent: 25 February 2016 11:26
To: 'ReactOS Development List' <ros-dev@reactos.org>
Subject: RE: [ros-dev] Consideration for migrating from Subversion to Git

> I think the real goal with moving to a platform such as github is
> reducing the entry barriers for new contributors. As it has been
> mentioned already, almost all projects who moved from SVN with "send
> patches" contribution system, to Git/Hg with Pull Requests have got
> non-negligible growth in contributions.

I'm confused, maybe it's your use of a double negative (non-negligible), but that sounds contradictory?
Are you saying that projects that have moved from SVN to git have had no growth or good growth in contributions?

Ged.



_______________________________________________
Ros-dev mailing list
Ros-dev@reactos.org
http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev