Re: [ros-dev] Undocumented APIs

[Magnus Olsen]

if we are not allown to use undoc struct or api
then this project is dead.
for example how ms open the directx hal interface and what value to put into
ntgdidd* to accpect the call is as well undoc. it was huge test and error
and ms directdraw driver interface are some part undoc by ms.
same with some gdi32 calls.

we must be allown to implement undoc api command and struct

I am not so good to type letters. I hope everyone understand what I mean



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Thomas Weidenmueller" <w3seek(a)reactos.com>
To: "ReactOS Development List" <ros-dev(a)reactos.org>
Sent: den 31 January 2006 11:50
Subject: Re: [ros-dev] Undocumented APIs


>   Ge van Geldorp wrote:
>  > 2) Should this be limited to APIs or include undocumented data 
structures
>   > too? An example I ran into last night: KPRCB. We
> know it's out there, 
some
> >   of the fields
> > are listed (e.g. by Probert) but I couldn't find any
> >  "official" documentation. 
>  That's going to be a huge problem because there's not just the KPRCB. A
>  lot of structures are incompletely documented or not documented at all.
>  But they exist and most driver developers know that...
>
>  - Thomas
>  _______________________________________________
>  Ros-dev mailing list
>  Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
>  http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev