1 Dec
2004
1 Dec
'04
9:41 p.m.
James Tabor wrote:
Hi!
Robert Shearman wrote:
Is this just a philosophical point that the dependencies should be less
than or equal to those of the Microsoft DLL, or is there some technical
reason? Maybe we are misusing setupapi in some way. If so, please let us
know.
Rob
What exactly do you mean by this? What are third and fourth level
dlls? What is the weird programming stuff you obviously dislike?
Simple app dlls, or should be simple, good example is wines advpack.dll.
Look at the wine imports compared to the real M$ advpack.dll imports you
will see. Why setupapi? advpack should be code dependent with ntdll,
kernel32, and gdi32. That was my point about that.