Hello,
thanks for the hint to use svnsync, I will give it a try. What is
currently exactly missing from explorer-new? I did not boot an up to
date ROS for a long time now. The problem with the source in the ROS
repository is, it get's a bit inaccessible over time. For example,
some time ago the VC project files have been deleted from the Wine
directory. So it's no more compilable as a single subproject - only as
part of the big build system. IBrowser is even not visible in a
branch, merely if you look into some old revision, as it was deleted
completely. I expect similar problems to happen also with ROS explorer
at some time in the future. You know I would still prefer an explorer
written in C++, but it seems most of you don't think this is the way
to go.
Currently I don't have any concrete plans to work on Explorer. It
became quite difficult to find and fix all those little bugs after the
base got stable - in conjunction with the GCC/MinGW restrictions.
Regards,
Martin
--
Martin Fuchs
martin-fuchs(a)gmx.net
2008/6/7 Aleksey Bragin <aleksey(a)reactos.org>rg>:
Hi,
it's quite far to the moment when explorer-new may substitute your
current explorer, especially having in mind the development speed of
explorer-new.
The subversion repository is open for cloning by everyone, in order
to do this you just need to use svnsync utility (ships by default
with newest versions), which is going to create you a 1:1 copy.
But, since it's not going to be removed anyway now (and in fact, it
may still be in our repo, just moved to branch, or wherever where , I
would suggest you do development still in the main svn.
Bytheway, do you have any plans about working more on it?
WBR,
Aleksey Bragin.