I agree on "beta" being more like 80-90% implementation coverage, however given the 80/20 rule applied to development, that says that < 20% of the bugs cause >80% of the bug reports (I'd guess this will be 5% of the bugs causing 95% of the reports, if not even more), so one could argue that having a codebase 80% complete, is still only 50% of the work, because the other 50% will be a whole lot of polishing.

On Wed, 28 Nov 2018 at 18:03, Ged Murphy <gedmurphy.maillists@gmail.com> wrote:

The link between 0.5 and beta was an old statement we used to have on our website, I’m not sure why that relationship existed other than a splitting an integer in half and assigning 0.5 to each stage.

I’m more of the opinion that beta products are close to release, so 0.8+ would be more suitable.

 

Anyway, it’s a conversation to be had internally.

 

Ged.

 

From: Ros-dev <ros-dev-bounces@reactos.org> On Behalf Of hermes.belusca@sfr.fr
Sent: Wednesday, 28 November 2018 16:51
To: ReactOS Development List <ros-dev@reactos.org>
Subject: Re: [ros-dev] Status Meeting (November 2018)

 

‌Hi!

Usually when we talk about ReactOS 0.5, we implicitly think that it will enter beta state there.
So unless you consider this to not completely hold anymore, we can look at what remains to be done/fixed (importantly) so that we may qualify as going into beta state.
(And yes, USB and storage sound strongly as prerequisites for 0.5 in my opinion).

Best,
Hermes

De : "Ged Murphy"
A : "'ReactOS Development List'"
Envoyé: mercredi 28 novembre 2018 17:42
Objet : Re: [ros-dev] Status Meeting (November 2018)
 

Some potential talking points:

 

  • Selecting a new coordinator
  • Version bump to 0.5
  • USB / Storage (perhaps linked to a 0.5 release)
  • Mattermost
  • New website progress

 

 

From: Ros-dev <ros-dev-bounces@reactos.org> On Behalf Of Mark Jansen
Sent: Wednesday, 28 November 2018 16:13
To: ReactOS Development List <ros-dev@reactos.org>
Subject: Re: [ros-dev] Status Meeting (November 2018)

 

We can discuss this if you are present, but I don't see the value in discussing it without you.

We have seen before that something discussed without the initiator being present is time not well spent, since it is a bit hard to argue with only one side of the argument present

 

 

 

Op 26 nov. 2018 12:15 schreef hermes.belusca@sfr.fr:

Hello,

I may not be available as it's the day when I'm going somewhere for a conference; it just depends at which time I arrive at destination.

For the meeting we may talk about the best way we can move to delivering all-in-one ReactOS ISOs (containing livecd + installation in both text and GUI modes), and which changes this could imply for our infrastructure (buildbots/website...).

Best regards,
Hermes

De : "Javier Agustìn Fernàndez Arroyo"
A : "ReactOS Development List"
Envoyé: samedi 24 novembre 2018 22:06
Objet : Re: [ros-dev] Status Meeting (November 2018)
 

I'm at work but I will do my best to attend!

 

El sáb., 24 nov. 2018 21:38, Colin Finck <colin@reactos.org> escribió:

Hi all!

Let me invite you to the November 2018 meeting, taking place next
Thursday, November 29, 2018 at 19:00 UTC.
Invited members will again receive their credentials shortly before the
meeting.

This will be the first meeting since August and I hope we get some more
topics than just the obligatory Status Reports. Please send your
proposals by replying to this mail.


Best regards,

Colin

_______________________________________________
Ros-dev mailing list
Ros-dev@reactos.org
http://reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev




_______________________________________________
Ros-dev mailing list
Ros-dev@reactos.org
http://reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev

 

 




_______________________________________________
Ros-dev mailing list
Ros-dev@reactos.org
http://reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev

 

_______________________________________________
Ros-dev mailing list
Ros-dev@reactos.org
http://reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev