On Wednesday 14 May 2008 05:08:34 pm Maarten Bosma wrote:
Actually I think the hole concept of autogenerating a
big make file is
messy. Also I don't understand why there are no better make tools around
(or if they are why we don't use them). ReactOs can't be the only project
that need a good build environment, can it ?
The Linux Kernel uses a complex system that auto-generates a file that is
included into a top-level makefile and contains all the variables needed to
tell that makefile which of the lower-level makefiles to actually use.
The problem with this is that MS's "nmake" isn't as smart as classic
make
programs.
DRH
Maarten
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 1:36 PM, Aleksey Bragin <aleksey(a)reactos.org> wrote:
> I obviously agree too (I don't want to blame anyone though). And
> certain design ideas outlined in KJK's paper are excellent.
>
> Also, I must say my last emails critique has been heard. Trunk never
> had so many good fixes and improvements since, I think, the beginning
> of 2008 year, as it had during this last week.
> This shows how much is possible to do if most of the development goes
> into one, good defined direction. There was enough of chaotic
> movement, it's time to get to the goal now.
>
> I will draft a beta roadmap, and send out an email to discuss it soon.
>
>
> With the best regards,
> Aleksey Bragin.
>
> On May 14, 2008, at 1:31 PM, gedmurphy wrote:
> > I was going to add my own gripes, but KJK appears to have covered
> > everything.
> > I'm therefore replying to this mail to show my support for his
> > thoughts as
> > opposed to adding 'hell yeah', 'damn right' or 'right
on' to the
> > end of each
> > topic.
> >
> > Ged.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ros-dev mailing list
> Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
>
http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
--
Dialup is like pissing through a pipette. Slow and excruciatingly painful.