Re: [ros-dev] Replacing unsafe TRUE comparisons (Following Re: bool => BOOL)

[Daniel Reimer]

Heheh, who could it be... ^^
It was always a event to watch you two arguing. ^^


Am 23.11.2014 21:57 schrieb Alex Ionescu <ionucu(a)videotron.ca>ca>:
>  
>  I'm just going to chime in here and confirm that Timo does indeed own a master's
> diploma on surviving pissing contests, taught by the greatest master there ever was.
>
>  Best regards,
>  Alex Ionescu
>
>  On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 11:47 AM, Timo Kreuzer <timo.kreuzer(a)web.de> wrote:
> >  
> >  Am 22.11.2014 11:39, schrieb Love Nystrom:
> > >  
> > >
> > >  On 2014-11-21 04.00, Timo Kreuzer wrote:
> > > >  
> > > >  Am 20.11.2014 14:18, schrieb Love Nystrom:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Well... Actually not exactly the same.. ;)
> > > > > "if (f != FALSE)" requires an explicit comparison with a second operand,
> > > >
> > > >  No, it does not. It requries the compiler to generate code that executes the following
> > > > statement, when f is not 0. 
> > >
> > >  I suspect we look at it from two different viewpoints here..
> > >  Yours is "C centric" and mine is "object code centric".
> > >  You talk about what the compiler is required to do, 
> > >  and I talk about what comes out at the end of compilation. 
> >  And what comes out at the end of the compilation is what the compiler creates. And the
> > compiler is following the rules of the C standard and the rules of logic.
> >  You claimed '"if (f != FALSE)" requires an explicit comparison with a
> > second operand,' and that is factually wrong. No matter whether you are looking at it
> > from the compiler perspective or from the perspective of an expressionist painter living
> > in a yellow tree house on the bottom of Lake Tanganyika.
> >
> > >  
> > >  And.. dear friend.. don't turn this into a pissing contest. 
> >  Don't even get me started. I battled the grand master and I survived.
> >
> >
> > >   Let's check the egos in with the coat check
> > > girl at the entrance.
> > >  May I ask how old you are? 
> >  Are we talking about age or maturity?
> >
> >  We better end this discussion, it's not leading anywhere. And you don't want me
> > to turn into the Grinch and steal your Christmas.
> >
> >  Thanks,
> >  Timo
> >
> >
> >  _______________________________________________
> >  Ros-dev mailing list
> >  Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
> >  http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
> >  
>