3 Jan
2006
3 Jan
'06
3:02 p.m.
Thomas Weidenmueller wrote:
I know, as I said, it was just for fun.
First day back at work after the Christmas break is hard going ;)
(and why are these mails being sent to both ros-diff and ros-dev when only
addressed to ros-dev, Gé ?)
Ged.
************************************************************************
The information contained in this message or any of its
attachments is confidential and is intended for the exclusive
use of the addressee. The information may also be legally
privileged. The views expressed may not be company policy,
but the personal views of the originator. If you are not the
addressee, any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other
dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this message in error, please contact
postmaster(a)exideuk.co.uk
<mailto:postmaster@exideuk.co.uk> and then delete this message.
Exide Technologies is an industrial and transportation battery
producer and recycler with operations in 89 countries.
Further information can be found at www.exide.com
Murphy, Ged (Bolton) wrote:
It's set via rbuilds MSDN backend. It needs functionality to set different
warning levels for different components. e.g. /w4 for core components only.
Having to do it manually is far too much effort for your average programmer
;)
Maybe I should stop moaning and correct it .... hmmm :p
which, IIRC (I don't have a compiler to hand)
would throw
up 'assignment in
expression' errors with our MSVC /w4 setting.
We would
therefore need
something like :
Then don't use that warning level if it rejects good code that's not
even confusing. Which has
suddenly become rather long for a normally simple
message loop
routine ..... LOL
It's exactly the same, just ugly IMO.