5 Apr
2011
5 Apr
'11
11:55 a.m.
AFAIK 6.x has a MAJOR difference in structure.
Swapping target before even arriving at our original destination
sounds like an invitation to a mess beyond description to me.
IMHO we may consider moving on to 6.x, *after* arriving at a stable,
workable, and useful 5.x.
For ex, many of my old colleagues *refuse* to use anything newer than XP
SP2, because of all
the compatibility issues, and they do *not* want that headache in addition
to dealing with their
own application code.
WBR // Love
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 6:45 PM, Adam <geekdundee(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I think it is NT 5.2 though. I cannot work out why not
set the target for
6.x though as that kernel is more stable than the 5.x version.
On Tue, 05 Apr 2011 21:29:58 +1000, Love Nystrom <love.nystrom(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
2011/4/5 Javier Agustìn Fernàndez Arroyo <elhoir(a)gmail.com>
AFAIK we are targetting 2003 kernel
But 2003 is still a 5.x kernel, isn't it ?
Or am I starting to suffer brain coagulation from recurrent heat stroke ?
I'm using 4th Ed as my compass .. and 5th edition address 6.x kernel.
If we're really working on a 6.x kernel now, I need to know where
we transcended
from 5.x so I can archive a private branch of 5.x at it's last known
version.
WBR // Love
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 10:33 AM, Love Nystrom <love.nystrom(a)gmail.com
--
Using Opera's revolutionary email client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
wrote:
>
> Hi James,
>>
>> Yes, most interesting, but isn't it a little beside point?
>> I mean, we're still targeting the XP kernel in ReactOS, aren't we?
>> Or have I missed a re-targeting point in my absence?
>>
>>
>>