Probably will be in the future. Only reason it wasn't was because I was not aware of the concern, the component wasn't listed on any of the packaging pages as should be included, and none of the testers pointed out a desire for it. One of the devs says he suggested this a while ago, but I had no awareness of the suggestion.
Shouldn't matter too much... we stick rosapps and rostests in there as optional components, I'm sure Wine Gecko shouldn't be too much of a problem to insert this way.On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 01:24:28 +1100, Olaf Siejka <caemyr@gmail.com> wrote:
Sure, why dont we add another 5-10 minutes to ros compile time....As for integration i just placed wine_gecko-1.0.0-x86.cab in trunk\modules\optional\Regards
2010/10/27 Adam Kachwalla <geekdundee@gmail.com>
What about Wine Gecko from source? Also, I would think that because it is a GPL module, it wouldn't matter if the binaries are there or not?By the way, did you have to extract the cab file into the modules/optional folder, or how did you integrate it?--Give a man a fish and he will eat for a day.
Teach a man to fish and he will eat for a lifetime.
Give a man religion and he will die praying for a fish.
_______________________________________________
Ros-dev mailing list
Ros-dev@reactos.org
http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev