12 Nov
2009
12 Nov
'09
3:42 p.m.
It's always funny to see how most people on this list talking about NT
really have no clue.
There would be no advantage to have a swap partition on Windows. Fast
I/O and Paging I/O more than make up for any "benefits" Linux has.
It's easy to have benefits to skip your FS when your FS model is
worthless. It becomes a much mooter point when your FS model is the
size and complexity (in terms of performance) of the competition's
kernel. Not to mention you could forget about crash dumps with a
separate partition.
And no, Windows 7 sets up a separate system volume (this is where boot
files go) to separate from the Win7 boot volume (this is where the
Windows system files go) and to allow BitLocker to work.
Best regards,
Alex Ionescu
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 3:18 AM, Love Nystrom <love.nystrom(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Brian wrote:
i was always under the impression that having a
swap
partition meant that you did not have to hassle with the file system
allowing for marginal performance boosts.
That is generally true. In theory, APIs
to access a swap partition can be
implemented to use the disk device driver directly, removing the additional
processing incurred by file systems drivers.
In practice on NT, I believe the proper way is to implement a swap
file system driver, which can be made more efficient than regular
file systems drivers.
_______________________________________________
Ros-dev mailing list
Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev