Re: [ros-dev] GDI_TABLE_ENTRY structure

[James Tabor]

Alex Ionescu wrote:
> Hey,
>
> Yes I was in a hurry, sorry.
> a. Modifying a well known, Microsoft-documented structure.
>   b. Using structure-based bit logic instead of shifts and masks.
> a. I think this is clear.
>   b. I think it makes the code less maintainable, harder to
>
> understand, less clean, and potentially hurts performance. This
> becomes a significantly bigger problem when thinking about other
> architectures with alignment requirements, or different endianness.
> 3) Use macros to hide away the mask/offsets, or better yet, inlined functions.

Could we use _X86_ for one structure type and have the other too?
Thanks,
James