6 May
2011
6 May
'11
7:56 a.m.
@Olaf,
yes, i agree that devs need useful bug reports, with debug logs, and regress
tests if possible.... but, its always better to have a bug report than to
not to have them, isnt it?
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 2:23 AM, Adam <geekdundee(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Although Olaf does indeed have a point. And vicmarcal
was on IRC for a few
hours going on about this as well; even when I was trying to have
conversations with other developers regarding another issue.
Not that I have anything against vicmarcal, but such interruptions do not
help. And the reports seem like the "It doesn't work" reports you may see
from end users who do not know what the problem is.
On Fri, 06 May 2011 10:03:11 +1000, Zachary Gorden <
drakekaizer666(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Olaf, I understand your frustration with this kind of stuff, but we do not
need this kind of antagonistic language. I
consider both of you to be
good
friends, and I would prefer not to see you two go at each other like this
or
let it spiral out of control.
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 4:41 PM, Olaf Siejka <caemyr(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Bugzilla is crowded with untouched bugs for so long, and you HAVE to add
> more crud to it? Bugs like no.6214, very usefull as we can see below:
>
> "1)Download ClickToDesktop
> 2)Run in ReactOS
> 3)Click on the desktop to hide. It doesn't work. Apps just lost the
> focus.
>
> Nothing appears in the DebugLog."
>
> Now that is informative... Why dont you get back doing something useful
> for
> a change?
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ros-dev mailing list
> Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>
>
--
Using Opera's revolutionary email client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
_______________________________________________
Ros-dev mailing list
Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev