29 Aug
2005
29 Aug
'05
5:36 p.m.
Don't run before you can walk.
On 8/29/05, Michael B. Trausch <fd0man(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Rick Langschultz wrote:
--
"I had a handle on life, but then it broke"
Why not; right? why envision something and it fail to be realized,
waste of time if i ever knew it...
Well, I can tell you one thing, I wouldn't want a person with that
attitude even hanging around one of my projects.
The thing barely works at the moment. Look at the ideas that you're
pushing and tell me how you think they would be implemented in the
source tree that they are working on right this moment. The system is
in very heavy, active development. What does this mean? They need it
to work... and they need it to work right. Features are great and all,
but if the basic system isn't there, why implement the features? Pointless.
The second thing is this: If you want it so badly, pick up a couple of
books, a good copy of the GNU Compiler Collection and appropriate
libraries, and get to work! Open Source is great because when someone
wants a feature, they can implement it... they don't have to coerce
others to implement a feature or a bug fix like you do when you're
working with Microsoft Windows. Think with your head, man.
I'm sure that they will work on performance related things and toys,
when the things *work*. They're putting a lot of work into the system;
I know that the activity on the project has picked up a lot from what it
used to be about a year ago... the developers are working hard as they
can to try to make things really happen with this project. And if I had
the time and the know-how, I'd be doing something, myself, other then
watching it run past me in my inbox.
Hopefully, if I ever get time to get the know-how to work on it, they'll
still need help ;-).
But the point is, don't complain, because if you don't want to implement
it yourself, then you don't want it badly enough. This project isn't
about world domination (well, maybe it is, but it's free software, so,
I'll make the assumption that it's not). It gives people a choice. It
gives people a great resume piece, too. When this system becomes the
little guy that tromped over the big bad fugly creature, the people that
are working on this project will have something that I probably won't
get -- a great chance at a great life with lots of vacation time and the
like, because these people will be in demand on the job market.
From a technical perspective, it would be stupid
to implement such
things right now, anyway. It is harder to pinpoint a bug if
you're
working with two highly unstable things verses one. React has a lot of
components in it that aren't tested well enough yet, and probably have
bugs. It'd be better to hit a stable version and then add new features
to it like what you're suggesting. It'd reduce the amount of time
required to implement said features, as well, becuase you wouldn't have
to go on as much or as long of a wild goose chase to find it.
So, then, all that having been said, go on, see ya later. :-)
- Mike
_______________________________________________
Ros-dev mailing list
Ros-dev(a)reactos.com
http://reactos.com:8080/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev