25 Aug
2011
25 Aug
'11
9:18 a.m.
I will this time.
As for public/private, I suppose majority wanted to have it private?
I don't have a strong position here because first of all we are not
going to discuss something, which is not for public ear, and second
is that meeting minutes are published anyway in our mailing list. If
meetings are strictly private (which is also just fine), then we need
to re-think the meeting process somehow so that meeting minutes would
be adjusted accordingly.
WBR,
Aleksey Bragin.
On Aug 25, 2011, at 1:32 AM, caemyr(a)myopera.com wrote:
Who will be leading the meeting?
On Wed, 24 Aug 2011 12:23 +0200, "Johannnes Anderwald"
<johannes.anderwald(a)reactos.org> wrote:
Am 24.08.2011 11:30, schrieb Aleksey Bragin:
> Hi,
> this is a reminder about the Status meeting, which is to happen
> tomorrow, 25th of August at 19:00 UTC. Please don't miss it.
>
> Proposed agenda for the meeting:
> 1. Arwinss adoption voting.
> 2. CMake adoption voting.
> 3. Release preparation status report, deciding on the next
> release date.
> 4. Driver signing. Discussing possible threats and deciding on an
> official position wrt driver signing in future.
> 4. Party related to GSoC results.
>
> I propose to move individual devs status reports to ros-dev mailing
> list, because there is no reason to just sit in the irc channel and
> listen to them for hours.
>
> List of participants:
> - Giannis Adamopoulos (smiley1_)
> - Johannes Anderwald (janderwald)
--
With best regards
Caemyr
_______________________________________________
Ros-dev mailing list
Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev