Re: [ros-dev] A call for 0.2.8

[Robert]

This would still work out with my plans.
I'll be able to do this release. BTW I intended to document and 
rbuildify (or the like) the process

WaxDragon schrieb:
> On 10/11/05, Casper Hornstrup [e-mail] wrote:
> > You can always branch back in time. Subversion is a time machine ;-)
> >
> > Casper
>
> Yup.  I propose 18406 as the branch point.  Do we need to hunt down
> RobertK or is the release process documented anywhere?
> WD
>
> <arty> don't question it ... it's clearly an optimization
>
> Ros-dev mailing list
> [e-mail]
> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev