Hi,
--- Robert K�pferl <rob(a)koepferl.de> wrote:
What-o-ever.
In some way I like the cluttered way ntvdm is implemented. Looking
forward on coming PC hardware and back to old DOSware and forward to
processor portability, I'd vote for DOSbox* as ROS's dos-box.
CPUs get faster and faster and evolution is going away from ia32 (With
vx86-mode). Thus a solely software implemented DOS-Box is more
appropriate, now.
Can we fix this theme somewhere? Steven? Jason?
*DOSbox = Freedos+bochs(win32)
I don't really care how its done. As far as I see it we dont have to be 100%
compatible when it
comes to dos/Win16. Some of the Wine guys have been working on making winedos.dll portable
so we
can use it if you would like. DOSbox would be cool with me as well.
Thanks
Steven
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - now with 250MB free storage. Learn more.
http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250