Hi,
--- Robert K�pferl rob@koepferl.de wrote:
What-o-ever. In some way I like the cluttered way ntvdm is implemented. Looking forward on coming PC hardware and back to old DOSware and forward to processor portability, I'd vote for DOSbox* as ROS's dos-box. CPUs get faster and faster and evolution is going away from ia32 (With vx86-mode). Thus a solely software implemented DOS-Box is more appropriate, now. Can we fix this theme somewhere? Steven? Jason?
*DOSbox = Freedos+bochs(win32)
I don't really care how its done. As far as I see it we dont have to be 100% compatible when it comes to dos/Win16. Some of the Wine guys have been working on making winedos.dll portable so we can use it if you would like. DOSbox would be cool with me as well.
Thanks Steven
__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - now with 250MB free storage. Learn more. http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250