I wanted to add a proper '?' switch, but I've seen that if I do that, chkdsk
in its current implementation runs afterwards a check (I noticed that after
the commit that added the '?'). So I temporarily disabled it in this commit
for further investigation (aka. modifying the ProcessCommandLine procedure
so that it doesn't run the checkdisk if you use '?', *and* such that it
doesn't say that '?' is an unrecognized cmdline option).
Hermès.
-----Message d'origine-----
De : Ros-dev [mailto:ros-dev-bounces@reactos.org] De la part de Thomas Faber
Envoyé : jeudi 3 mars 2016 11:27
À : ros-dev(a)reactos.org
Objet : Re: [ros-dev] [ros-diffs] [hbelusca] 70869: [AUTOCHK][CHKDSK]: Minor
fixes / formatting. Really add chkdsk to build. [FMIFS]: Quickly implement
the chkdsk function, the same way as it is done for the formatting function.
On 2016-03-03 01:36, hbelusca(a)svn.reactos.org wrote:
@@ -160,9 +163,9 @@
switch (argv[i][1])
{
- case L'?':
- Usage(argv[0]);
- break;
+ // case L'?':
+ // Usage(argv[0]);
+ // return i;
case L'F': case L'f':
{
What is the purpose of this?
Thanks,
Thomas
_______________________________________________
Ros-dev mailing list
Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev