Aleksey Bragin wrote:
There will be a WineConf event in 1 or 2 weeks, and they say they are going to clear up the legal situation around Wine, around SFLC audit and around requirements to the developers, whose code may be commited to the tree.
When they do it, I would be very glad to know those requirements, and enforce them on ReactOS developers, so that we are on the common ground.
Wine is the Pot calling the kettle BLACK! Bunch of RE coders using smoke and mirrors when it comes to case testing! It's a easy out!
I'm opposed to the SFLC! I don't like someone outside org telling me how to code. SFLC == Microsoft! Just wait and see. SFLC are hogging up all the FOSS projects to be used for their purposes not ours. I do not want their help and we need to stay away from them. We are GNU not SFLC!
Notes to remember: a Jeremy White CodeWeavers CEO,"no we are going to be doing the audit anyway there is no point in doing anything rash". b Wine has been planning this Audit with the SFLC from day 1 of its creation. c Full year before the Hartmut incident. d SFLC. Do you know who they wanted the first client to be? WINE.
Point "a" is interesting, doing something rash?,,, alarming?,,, letting someone know something big might be happening? Point "b" 2005-02-12 Point "c" Month before, there was an attempt to bring down ReactOS. The "My attitude", http://www.reactos.org/archives/public/ros-dev/2005-December/006569.html http://www.reactos.org/archives/public/ros-dev/2005-December/006570.html
Read mike_m quotes. http://www.reactos.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=34323#34323
I haven't been able to post to the wine'ies mail list for sometime now. So, where is the free speech you might ask? With SFLC there is no free speech and you bet your ass there will be no free code once they finish their little take over of FOSS projects.
The word "OUR" keeps popping up.
"Wine is crucial to our interoperability portfolio", Eben Moglen SFLC Chairman James
WBR, Aleksey Bragin.