23 Sep
2007
23 Sep
'07
2 a.m.
Aleksey Bragin wrote:
There will be a WineConf event in 1 or 2 weeks, and they say they are
going to clear up the legal situation around Wine, around SFLC audit
and around requirements to the developers, whose code may be commited
to the tree.
When they do it, I would be very glad to know those requirements, and
enforce them on ReactOS developers, so that we are on the common ground.
Wine is the Pot calling the kettle BLACK! Bunch of RE coders using smoke and
mirrors when it comes to case testing! It's a easy out!
I'm opposed to the SFLC! I don't like someone outside org telling me how
to code. SFLC == Microsoft! Just wait and see. SFLC are hogging up all the
FOSS projects to be used for their purposes not ours. I do not want their
help and we need to stay away from them. We are GNU not SFLC!
Notes to remember:
a Jeremy White CodeWeavers CEO,"no we are going to be doing the audit anyway
there is no point in doing anything rash".
b Wine has been planning this Audit with the SFLC from day 1 of its creation.
c Full year before the Hartmut incident.
d SFLC. Do you know who they wanted the first client to be? WINE.
Point "a" is interesting, doing something rash?,,, alarming?,,, letting someone
know something big might be happening?
Point "b" 2005-02-12
Point "c" Month before, there was an attempt to bring down ReactOS.
The "My attitude",
http://www.reactos.org/archives/public/ros-dev/2005-December/006569.html
http://www.reactos.org/archives/public/ros-dev/2005-December/006570.html
Read mike_m quotes.
http://www.reactos.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=34323#34323
I haven't been able to post to the wine'ies mail list for sometime now.
So, where is the free speech you might ask? With SFLC there is no free
speech and you bet your ass there will be no free code once they finish
their little take over of FOSS projects.
The word "OUR" keeps popping up.
"Wine is crucial to our interoperability portfolio", Eben Moglen SFLC Chairman
James
WBR,
Aleksey Bragin.