Psychologically, "Windows 2000 Compatible" sounds a lot better than "Windows NT 4.0 Compatible"
On 2/3/06, Maarten Bosma maarten.paul@bosma.de wrote:
Royce Mitchell III wrote:
Since we changed the reported version to Windows 2000, i'd say that is not true anymore is it ?
We report higher version for application compatibility reasons. It doesn't mean we're going after every win2k feature :)
I still think that it would be good to change the official compatibly goal to 2000. Not for technical but just for "marketing" reasons. "NT 4.0 Compatibly" simply sound odd. :P
Maarten Bosma _______________________________________________ Ros-dev mailing list Ros-dev@reactos.org http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
-- "I had a handle on life, but then it broke"