Re: [ros-dev] White Paper outdated ?

[TwoTailedFox]

Psychologically, "Windows 2000 Compatible" sounds a lot better than
"Windows NT 4.0 Compatible"

On 2/3/06, Maarten Bosma <maarten.paul(a)bosma.de> wrote:
>   Royce Mitchell III wrote:
> > >   Since we
> > > changed the reported version to Windows 2000, i'd say that is
> > >  not true anymore is it ? 
> >
> >  We report higher version for application compatibility reasons. It
> >  doesn't mean we're going after every win2k feature :)
> >  
>  I still think that it would be good to change the official compatibly
>  goal to 2000. Not for technical but just for "marketing" reasons. "NT
>  4.0 Compatibly" simply sound odd. :P
>
>
>  Maarten Bosma
>  _______________________________________________
>  Ros-dev mailing list
>  Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
>  http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>  

--
"I had a handle on life, but then it broke"