RE: [ros-dev] Re: [ros-svn] [hpoussin] 18453: Remove entries that are created by netcfgx.dll

[Hervé Poussineau]

Hello,

-----Message d'origine-----
De : ros-dev-bounces(a)reactos.org [mailto:[e-mail]] De la
part de James Tabor
Envoyé : samedi 15 octobre 2005 02:52
À : ros-dev(a)reactos.org
Objet : [ros-dev] Re: [ros-svn] [hpoussin] 18453: Remove entries that are
created by netcfgx.dll
>   Hi!
>  Will we need to add entries in hivesys for ROS Ne2K pci (2) driver?
>
>  Currently the driver loads but ROS dhclient does not work. All my other 
dhclient
systems, Win98-2 and XP work.
>  
>  Thanks,
>  James 
* Here are some of the entries created by setupapi when installing ne2000
(by processing media/inf/netisa.inf)

in HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\ne2000
	ErrorControl (REG_DWORD) = 1
	Group (REG_SZ) = "NDIS"
	ImagePath (REG_EXPAND_SZ) = "System32\drivers\ne2000.sys"
	Start (REG_DWORD) = 3
	Type (REG_DWORD) = 3

in
HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Class\{4D36E972-E325-11CE-BFC1-08002bE
10318}\{Index}
	DriverDesc (REG_SZ) = "NE2000 compatible"
	ProviderName (REG_SZ) = "ReactOS team"
	Port (REG_SZ) = "c100"
	Irq (REG_SZ) = "B"
	NetworkAddress (REG_SZ) = "001122334455"


* Here are the registry entries created for all netcards by netcfgx.dll

in HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\{RANDOMGUID}\Parameters\Tcpip
	DefaultGateway (REG_SZ) = "0.0.0.0"
	IPAddress (REG_SZ) = "0.0.0.0"
	SubnetMask (REG_SZ) = "0.0.0.0"

in
HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Class\{4D36E972-E325-11CE-BFC1-08002bE
10318}\{Index}
	NetCfgInstanceId (REG_SZ) = "{RANDOMGUID}

in
HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Class\{4D36E972-E325-11CE-BFC1-08002bE
10318}\{Index}\Linkage
	Export (REG_SZ) = "\Device\{RANDOMGUID}"
	RootDevice (REG_SZ) = "{RANDOMGUID}"
	UpperBind (REG_SZ) = "Tcpip"

in
HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Network\{4D36E972-E325-11CE-BFC1-08002
BE10318}\{RANDOMGUID}
	Name (REG_SZ) = "Network connection"

in HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\Tcpip\Linkage
	Bind (REG_MULTI_SZ) = "\Device\{RANDOMGUID}"
	Export (REG_MULTI_SZ) = "\Device\Tcpip_{RANDOMGUID}"
	Route (REG_MULTI_SZ) = "{RANDOMGUID}"


* Mismatching entries with your setup (Ne20001 is replaced by a random GUID)

Before
	
HKLM,"SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\Ne2000","Type",0x00010001,0x00000001
(SERVICE_SYSTEM_START)
	
HKLM,"SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Class\{4D36E972-E325-11CE-BFC1-08002B
E10318}\0001","Port",0x00000000,"D000"
	
HKLM,"SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\Ne20001\Parameters\Tcpip","DefaultGa
teway",0x00010000,"10.65.145.1"
	
HKLM,"SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\Ne20001\Parameters\Tcpip","IPAddress
",0x00010000,"10.65.145.79"
	
HKLM,"SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\Ne20001\Parameters\Tcpip","SubnetMas
k",0x00010000,"255.255.255.0"
Now
	
HKLM,"SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\Ne2000","Type",0x00010001,0x00000003
(SERVICE_DEMAND_START)
	
HKLM,"SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Class\{4D36E972-E325-11CE-BFC1-08002B
E10318}\0001","Port",0x00000000,"c100"
	
HKLM,"SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\{RANDOMGUID}\Parameters\Tcpip","Defa
ultGateway",0x00010000,"0.0.0.0"
	
HKLM,"SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\{RANDOMGUID}\Parameters\Tcpip","IPAd
dress",0x00010000,"0.0.0.0"
	
HKLM,"SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\{RANDOMGUID}\Parameters\Tcpip","Subn
etMask",0x00010000,"0.0.0.0"

* Missing entries now
	
HKLM,"SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Class\{4D36E972-E325-11CE-BFC1-08002B
E10318}\{Index}","Characteristics",0x00010001,0x00000000
	
HKLM,"SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Class\{4D36E972-E325-11CE-BFC1-08002B
E10318}\{Index}","BusType",0x00000000,"5"
	
HKLM,"SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Class\{4D36E972-E325-11CE-BFC1-08002B
E10318}\{Index}","SlotNumber",0x00000000,"11"
	
HKLM,"SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Class\{4D36E972-E325-11CE-BFC1-08002B
E10318}\{Index}","BusNumber",0x00000000,"0"
	
HKLM,"SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\Ne2000","Route",0x00000000,"Ne20001"

I don't think DHCP registry entries are important (btw, we need a control
panel to change them)
The Route entry in Ne2000 service seems useless (not used by ne2000.sys)
For other differences, can you try the attached patch and see if something
happens?

Regards,

Hervé