31 Jul
2010
31 Jul
'10
12:39 a.m.
On 30 July 2010 22:44, victor martinez <vicmarcal(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
In my opinion there are more mandatory things:
1) Avoiding to commit partial code. For partial code or
partial-semi-working features you can use branchs.
2) Just tested code commited to trunk. You can make (ab)use of testers or
try in your own. We have regressed a lot after the big bug hunting.
3) Freezing trunk until the current code is stable enough. In the same way
Windows invented the word "Downgrade" with Vista we have invented the
"RegressOS" word.
4) And then, after we have "something" we can improve the
"something".
5) And after that we can talk about changing to Git, using CMAKE,and
restructuring a Tree, or a Forest.
I am not saying a restructure is needed, or moving to CMAKE is a bad thing.
But we have better things to be done.
Although valid, I don't think any of your points have anything to do with a
tree restructure.
Maybe you misunderstand the reasoning behind the proposed architecture and
what it can do to help us?
Anyone who is unsure should speak with Timo or maybe lassy in IRC and they
can better help to explain it from a development perspective.
Ged.