Re: [ros-dev] [ros-diffs] [cgutman] 46876: [PCMCIA] - Add a mostly stubbed PCMCIA driver - pcmcia.c is complete but fdo.c and pdo.c are completely unimplemented

[Ged Murphy]

I don't mean to sound like a broken record, and I also understand that the project
allows people to work on whatever they want to. But with the project in such a state at
the moment, is a pcmcia bus driver really the best thing to be working on?
I'm all for project freedom, but you would hope people to have the diligence to work
on areas which might help to stop the project from failing.

Maybe I just don't get it anymore and I'm behind the times, but what happened to
the days when people used to work on important things?


Your nagging ex-dev,
Ged.




-----Original Message-----
From: ros-diffs-bounces(a)reactos.org [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of
cgutman(a)svn.reactos.org
Sent: 15 April 2010 02:59
To: ros-diffs(a)reactos.org
Subject: [ros-diffs] [cgutman] 46876: [PCMCIA] - Add a mostly stubbed PCMCIA driver -
pcmcia.c is complete but fdo.c and pdo.c are completely unimplemented

Author: cgutman
Date: Thu Apr 15 03:59:15 2010
New Revision: 46876

URL: http://svn.reactos.org/svn/reactos?rev=46876&view=rev
Log:
[PCMCIA]
- Add a mostly stubbed PCMCIA driver
- pcmcia.c is complete but fdo.c and pdo.c are completely unimplemented

Added:
    trunk/reactos/drivers/bus/pcmcia/
    trunk/reactos/drivers/bus/pcmcia/fdo.c   (with props)
    trunk/reactos/drivers/bus/pcmcia/pcmcia.c   (with props)
    trunk/reactos/drivers/bus/pcmcia/pcmcia.h   (with props)
    trunk/reactos/drivers/bus/pcmcia/pcmcia.rbuild   (with props)
    trunk/reactos/drivers/bus/pcmcia/pcmcia.rc   (with props)
    trunk/reactos/drivers/bus/pcmcia/pdo.c   (with props)
Modified:
    trunk/reactos/drivers/bus/directory.rbuild