Re: [ros-dev] ROS-release prepared

[Brandon Turner]

Don't take anything off the wiki for about 2 more hours!  It is 
unfinished and mess like you said.  Filip looked over the changes and in 
general most are right so I'm adding them to wiki.  I will be done in 
about 2 hours with new formatting and all changes.  Please hold out if 
you can.  I will also be making a less techincal version to explain 
things different in 0.2.7. 

Thanks
Brandon

Robert Köpferl wrote:

>   Just now, I was on to extract the changelog off the
> wiki.
>  While I came across your message, I thought, that this is exactly the 
>  right information I need. I can't say whehter you shal include this or 
>  that. At least it is usus to not provide every very detail, because 
>  the changelog on sf is rather for end-users to read (if). If you tell 
>  me to include your information in the wiki, I'll wait till tomorrow to 
>  include it.
>  Seems like it is my part to delete potential unnecessary log entries. 
>  Or is anyone here who claims this decissions for her/himself ??
>
>  Brandon Turner wrote:
>
> >   In an attempt to make this more of a full release
> > then something we 
> >  are blwoing off I have skimmed through the svn logs and pulled out 
> >  all things i think should be in the change log.  Here is a raw output 
> >  of what changes i think should should be added:  
> >  www.brandonturner.org/ROS/0.2.7.txt   I dont know if i said this in 
> >  my last email or not but I dont know what is important what isnt 
> >  really so this could be way off.  3 big things that happened which 
> >  arent stressed in the raw log, Filip changed everything(?) to 
> >  USE_W32API, Filip and Alex mostly did all the ndk and other header 
> >  fixes to make them windows compatible, Casper did rbuild.  I dont 
> >  know if the first two things will be added in generic or need to be 
> >  added in all sections that they apply too(im guessing most?).  
> >  Anyways, later today im going to go through the raw changes again and 
> >  later tonight im going to add them to the wiki.  Please tell me 
> >  anything in there that should not be added to change log or anything 
> >  i missed.
> >
> >  Thanks
> >  Brandon
> >
> >  Robert Köpferl wrote:
> >
> > >  
> > >
> > >  WaxDragon wrote:
> > >
> > > >   These issues you have described are known, but
> > > > intermittent.  I have
> > > >  tested the 0.2.7 branch under vmware, qemu and real hardware, and the
> > > >  branch has performed consistantly under each platform.  Considering
> > > >  the bugs we *did* catch for 0.2.7, I think it's a good release.  The
> > > >  0.2.7 branch has the TC 's blessing. Ship it. 
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >  Your word in echelon's ear.
> > >  It'll be upped until tomorrow.
> > >  The RC-releases will disappear as will 2.6
> > >
> > >  Hope this will be one of our better releases. (looking to 2.6)
> > >
> > >
> > > >  
> > > >  WD 
> > >
> > >
> > >  _______________________________________________
> > >  Ros-dev mailing list
> > >  Ros-dev(a)reactos.com
> > >  http://reactos.com:8080/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
> > >
> > >  
> >  _______________________________________________
> >  Ros-dev mailing list
> >  Ros-dev(a)reactos.com
> >  http://reactos.com:8080/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
> >  
>  _______________________________________________
>  Ros-dev mailing list
>  Ros-dev(a)reactos.com
>  http://reactos.com:8080/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>
>